Comparison of the Reliability of Strength Limit Calculation Methods for Prismatic Samples with Different Spreading of Normal Contact Stresses in Their Wedge Failure Shape

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorVasyliev, Leoniden
dc.contributor.authorVasyliev, Dmytroen
dc.contributor.authorMalich, Mykola H.en
dc.contributor.authorRizo, Zakharen
dc.contributor.authorKress, Denysen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-08T11:53:17Z
dc.date.available2025-05-08T11:53:17Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionM. Malich: ORCID 0000-0003-4967-5378en
dc.description.abstractENG: This article explores methods for calculating the strength limits of solid objects subjected to compression. Traditionally, two stress distribution patterns are used: the exponential pattern by E.P. Unksov and the linear pattern by L. Prandtl. The authors introduce an enhanced stress distribution method. They compare the accuracy of these methods in calculating strength limits and constructing "normal stress - longitudinal strain" diagrams for wedge-shaped failures in rock samples. Four properties are considered: shear strength, coefficients of internal and external friction, and elasticity modulus. The results show that, with an external friction coefficient up to 0.3, all methods yield similar accuracy in strength limit calculations and ultimate stress-strain curves. Some curves exhibit stress drops, explained by a transition from convex to concave slip lines during failure. Additionally, there are hardening curves in the ultimate curves without theoretical justification. The comparison of calculated strength limits with experimental data confirms the method's accuracy: 13.7% error for the exponential method, 11.4% for the linear method, and 8.1% for the enhanced distribution, especially for low contact friction values (up to fc=0.3).en
dc.description.sponsorshipM.S. Poliakov Institute of Geotechnical Mechanics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Dniproen
dc.identifier.citationVasyliev L., Vasyliev D., Malich M., Rizo Z., Kress D. Comparison of the Reliability of Strength Limit Calculation Methods for Prismatic Samples with Different Spreading of Normal Contact Stresses in Their Wedge Failure Shape. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2024. Vol. 1348 : Proc. of the V International Conference "Essays of Mining Science and Practice" (08/11/2023 – 10/11/2023). Art. 012033. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1348/1/012033.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1755-1315/1348/1/012033
dc.identifier.issn1755-1307 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn1755-1315 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1348/1/012033en
dc.identifier.urihttps://crust.ust.edu.ua/handle/123456789/20258en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltden
dc.subjectstress distribution patternsen
dc.subjectrocksen
dc.subjectdiagramsen
dc.subject"stress - longitudinal deformation"en
dc.subjectshear strengthen
dc.subjectcoefficients of internal and external frictionen
dc.subjectelasticity modulusen
dc.subjectКГМuk_UA
dc.subject.classificationTECHNOLOGYen
dc.titleComparison of the Reliability of Strength Limit Calculation Methods for Prismatic Samples with Different Spreading of Normal Contact Stresses in Their Wedge Failure Shapeen
dc.title.alternativeПорівняння достовірності методів розрахунку границі міцності для призматичних зразків з різним розподілом нормальних контактних напружень при клиноподібній формі руйнуванняuk_UA
dc.typeArticleen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Vasyliev_Vasyliev.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Статті КГМ (ДМетІ)